Skip to main content

A Study of the Qur'anic Oaths by Farahi: Section 18

Desirable and Undesirable Oaths

Since oaths are sworn in order either to present oneself or the Almighty as witness to some facts, in both cases, the oath-taker puts his honor or religion on stake. It is not something to play with. This entails that an oath may not be taken unless in grave matters and that too with solemn resolution. This is why it has been forbidden in certain cases:

i.        from the perspective of muqsam ‘alayhi

ii.      from the perspective of muqsam bihī

iii.     from the perspective of the both.

i. Whoever takes an oath in every petty matter proves to be an unserious person. Such a man does not succeed in upholding his personal honor. That is why the Almighty has forbidden this act in the Qur’ān. The relevant Qur’ānic verse uses very emphatic language. The Almighty says:

Heed not every despicable (mahīn) swearer (ḥallāf). (Q 68:10)

Whoever takes to swearing an oath on every petty matter puts himself down no matter he swears by God or anything else. He is an unreasonable person who gets enraged or laughs out without provocation. This renders swearing undesirable considering the muqsam ‘alayhi.

ii. Swearing a religious oath in the name of other than God is tantamount to taking that entity as partner besides God. The prohibition to take an oath by an entity other than God generally shuts the door for polytheism. This is identical to the prohibition to prostrate oneself before other than God or carving idols as stated in the tenth commandments. Thus swearing by other than God is prohibited. It has been said in the Old Testament:

You shall fear the Lord your God and serve Him, and shall take oaths in His name. (Deuteronomy 6:13)

Similarly the Prophet (sws) too prohibited taking oaths by anything other than God.

3. Sometimes a man swears by God upon every petty matter. Such an act combines two things, lack of personal honor and absence of God-consciousness (taqwā). The following saying of God Almighty refers to this aspect of oaths.

And do not use God’s name as an excuse in your oaths. (Q 2:224)

Under these considerations, oaths are to be avoided. Other than this, it is allowable to swear especially under social necessities discussed in the seventh and tenth section of this work.

The Islamic sharī‘ah has been revealed for the entire humanity. It is applicable till the Day of Judgment. It takes into account the social and cultural needs of human beings. It does not impose strict detailed laws in matters pertaining to cultural aspect of life. It also considers the inherent weakness of human nature as has been alluded to in the following verse of the Qur’ān:

God desires to lighten your burden, for man has been created weak. (Q 4: 28)

Therefore, it was not appropriate to promulgate absolute prohibition to swear an oath, an unavoidable proceeding in the conducting of important religious and social issues. Similarly the sharī‘ah has not held unintentional conversational oaths as punishable. In this regard, the Almighty says:

God shall not call you to account for your inadvertent oaths. However, He shall hold you accountable for the ones that you take with intention in your hearts. Indeed God is the Forgiving, the Tolerant. (Q 2:225)

Actions are judged by intentions. Inadvertent oaths, though reflect incivility, are not punishable. The Lord of men forgives His servants. He showers mercy on them considering their weakness. He does not hold them accountable for small and insignificant errors.

The above discussion specifically pertains to the general oaths. As for the Qur’ānic oaths they are clearly oaths of evidence, and there is no danger of losing religion and honor in taking such an oath. No disgrace attaches them.

The Qur’ānic oaths mostly support assertions concerning unicity of God, the Last Judgment and the Prophecy. All these issues are evidently glorious in nature and most worthy to be emphasized by way of an oath. If one swears that these facts are true he does not stake his self respect and honor. One should not prohibit swearing of these facts fearing that affirming these facts is to admit things liable to be untrue. Admitting such fears and doubting the veracity of these manifest religious truths would put his faith in danger. This is because these facts do not admit of any doubt. Such oaths reflect witnessing religious facts which the Prophets of God have always been openly promoting. A Prophet, in his preaching in general, claims that God has sent him knowingly. He claims that God witnesses his veracity. He asserts that he depends upon God and relies on Him. He states that he holds God a guarantor of his claims. These are the themes which are stressed by swearing by God as has been explained in the tenth section. Then why should not He adopt oaths to emphasize these claims? It is evident that when God takes an oath by any of His creations, or by His words, there is no possibility of polytheism in this proceeding. It is also clear that such oaths are only taken in order to present proof for certain facts. These do not involve any kind of glorification of muqsam bihī.

To conclude, we hold that the objections on the Qur’ānic oaths or on the oaths of the Prophets or the pious individuals as well as absolute prohibition of swearing are rooted in a lack of analysis and a failure to differentiate between different aspects of divine directives. By swearing by God, the Prophets and the pious people express that they rely on God, turn to Him and seek His help. This is the real picture of the question on legality of swearing an oath. However, it has been attributed to Jesus Christ (sws) that he rendered taking an oath in general as prohibited. We believe that this prohibition is specific and not general. To this point now we turn. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

English Translation of al-Jahshiyari’s Kitab al-Wuzaraʾ wa al-Kuttab: 2

The Scribes Among The Persians The kings of Persia were exceedingly strict with anyone who forged or engraved a seal resembling the royal seal. They considered such a crime equal to the gravest offenses and punished it accordingly. The Persian kings referred to the letter-writers as “the interpreters ( tarājimah ) of kings.” They used to say to them: “Do not let your desire to make speech concise lead you to omit meanings, abandon proper structure and clarity ( al-iblāgh ) in it or weaken the strength of argument.” It was the established practice in the days of the Persians that the younger generation ( aḥdāth al-kuttāb ) of scribes, and those newly emerging among them, would gather at the palace gates seeking employment. The king would then command the heads of his chancery to test them and examine their intellects. Those found worthy would have their names presented to the king and would be instructed to remain at the gate so they could be called upon when needed. The king w...

شرح صحیح مسلم، امام نووی :مقدمات، ۴ صحیحین کی فضیلت اور ترجیح

-فصل: [صحیحین کی فضیلت اور ترجیح] علماء کرامؒ کا اس پر اتفاق ہے کہ قرآنِ کریم کے بعد سب سے معتبر اور صحیح کتابیں صحیحین، یعنی امام بخاریؒ کی صحیح اور امام مسلمؒ  کی صحیح ہیں۔ امت سے ان دونوں کتابوں کو قبولیت ملی ہے ۔ البتہ صحیح بخاریؒ ان دونوں میں زیادہ معتبر اور صحیح ہے، اور اس میں ظاہر و خفی فوائدو معارف کی کثرت بھی ہے ۔ یہ بھی واضح ہے کہ امام مسلمؒ خود امام بخاریؒ سے استفادہ کرتے اور اس بات کا اعتراف فرماتے ہیں کہ علمِ حدیث میں ان کی کوئی نظیر نہیں۔ صحیح بخاریؒ کی صحیح مسلمؒ پر ترجیح کا یہ نقطہ نظر جمہور، اہلِ اتقان، اصحابِ حذق، اور دقائقِ حدیث میں غور کرنے والوں کا ہے۔ البتہ ابو علی حسین بن علی نیسابوری حافظ، جو امام حاکم ابو عبد اللہ بن البیع کے شیخ ہیں، نے مسلم کی کتاب کو صحیح تر قرار دیا ہے۔ مغرب کے بعض مشائخ  نے بھی ان کی موافقت کی ہےاور صحیح مسلمؒ کو افضل کہا ہے۔  مگر درست اور صائب پہلی رائے ہے۔  امام حافظ، فقیہ، اور ناقد ابو بکر اسماعیلیؒ نے اپنی کتاب المدخل میں بخاریؒ کی ترجیح کے مضبوط دلائل بیان کیے ہیں۔ ہمارے سامنے امام ابو عبد الرحمن نسائیؒ کی روایت آئی...

شرح صحیح مسلم، امام نووی :مقدمات، ۳ صحیح مسلمؒ کی شہرت اور اس کے طرقِ روایت

 :۔ فصل:[ صحیح مسلمؒ کی شہرت اور اس کے طرقِ روایت] [ صحیح مسلمؒ کا تواتر اور انتساب] صحیح مسلمؒ کی شہرت انتہائی درجے کو پہنچی ہوئی ہے، اور اجمالی اعتبار سے یہ کتاب امام مسلمؒ سے تواتر کے درجے میں ثابت ہے۔ اس لیے اس امر کا قطعی علم حاصل ہے کہ یہ ابو الحسین مسلم بن الحجاجؒ ہی کی تصنیف ہے۔ البتہ جہاں تک متصل اسناد کے ساتھ امام مسلمؒ تک پہنچنے والی روایت کا تعلق ہے، تو ہمارے بلاد اور ادوار میں اس کا سلسلہ عملاً ایک ہی طریق پر منحصر ہو کر رہ گیا ہے، اور وہ ابو اسحاق ابراہیم بن محمد بن سفیان کی امام مسلمؒ سے روایت ہے۔ [مشرق اور مغرب میں روایت کے معروف طریق ] بلادِ مغرب میں اس کے ساتھ ساتھ ابو محمد احمد بن علی القلانسی کی روایت بھی امام مسلمؒ سے منقول ہے۔ ابن سفیان سے اس کتاب کو ایک جماعت نے روایت کیا، جن میں جلودی بھی شامل ہیں۔ جلودی سے بھی ایک جماعت نے اسے روایت کیا، جن میں فارسی ہیں۔ فارسی سے بھی ایک جماعت نے روایت کیا، جن میں فراوی ہیں۔ فراوی سے بھی بہت سے لوگوں نے روایت کیا، جن میں منصور ہیں۔ اور منصور سے بھی ایک بڑی جماعت نے روایت کیا، جن میں ہمارے شیخ ابو اسحاق شامل ہیں۔ شیخ، امام،...